Do you remember last year when I complained about the absolutely dismal coverage of Richard Flanagan's speech (among other things), because I thought the Australian and Canadian markets had some things in common and maybe, just maybe, the things Flanagan was worried about might have implications for us here in Canada, and that maybe we should talk about what setting that kind of a precedent meant? You know, before it became so urgent that we might panic and do something stupid. Do you remember that? I remember that.
Well, I fucking told you so. It's still not too late to have the (public, reasoned, analytical) conversation we should have had a year ago, but it's coming down to the wire. Any of you boys and girls in the press want to actually step the fuck up this time?
Comments
Post a comment
NB - If you post a comment and it doesn't appear right away, you may need to refresh the page. I'm not sure why this is so, but I'm working on it.